25 Changes in “Secure the Vote” Act
Change |
Comment |
|
This gives time for election officials to verify that the person applying for registration to vote is actually a resident. |
|
Voters must enter the election system and cast their ballots with a Utah-issued photo ID that both identifies the individual and establishes their residency. |
|
This initiative is re-orientating Utah’s voting system from voting through the mail to a precinct voting system. We estimate over 90% of the voting will occur at precincts, where the vote count is observed and reported that night. |
|
As with other facets of this Act, the concern here is needless chain-of-custody issues that might arise with ballots sitting in drop boxes. |
|
The same linkage to photo identification that occurs at the polls must be maintained with the ballots that will still be mailed in. Drop boxes also make the election process vulnerable to chain-of-custody issues. |
|
This is a return to the proven system that was used in Utah for decades that decentralizes ballot counting and allows campaigns and citizens to observe the actual counting of the ballots, with results produced on election night in each precinct that are reported publicly. |
|
It is required by federal law (ADA, HAVA) that those who are severely disabled be able to use special devices to vote, which creates some electronic ballots, as does federally mandated military voting. |
|
This is a new category of ballot for those who are (1) placed on short notice in a medical facility or required by their physician to remain at home; or (2) have an unforeseen family, work, or another emergency. A designated person on behalf of the voter goes to the county for the ballot and must return it there the day before the election (to give processing time to election officials and poll workers). |
|
Massive numbers of mail-in ballots create chain of custody issues until they are received to be counted, and then are tabulated in centralized locations where observers see the whirling machines but are not observing the actual counting of the votes. |
|
Experimenting with voting on the hackable internet or allowing votes for several candidates which requires centralized, electronic tabulation works against the needed reform we propose--- the time-tested neighborhood voting system with paper ballots and observable hand counts. About Ranked Choice voting: many voters like the idea of “more choices.” While it provides more candidates a voter can express some support for, it has tended to create a strategy for candidates to be vaguer to appeal to a broader group for more rankings, rather than building a base around clear positions on the issues. |
|
Early voting creates ballot storage issues, and in some cases buyers' remorse among the voters. It also draws more money into the election process as candidates have to currently cover a 21-day period where almost all the ballots are available for voting. |
|
This is an inexpensive way to identify every ballot and its legal status. |
|
Each precinct in the state is limited to no more than 1250 voters, which is a manageable number to work with. |
|
See above. |
|
In-person, neighborhood voting with a picture ID that establishes residency will be much safer than the current system, particularly when you add the counting of that vote at the same location, by election night. |
|
There is no reason for the public to have to wait for days because a huge number of the votes are not counted on election day. |
|
Having election judges count during election day ensures results can be reported on election night. |
|
This is the system that used to exist in this state. It allows election judges to complete their work and give the public election results a lot sooner than we get them now. |
|
Reporting the precinct's results to the public as well as the county election office ensures an honest, accurate total count. |
|
This protects legal voters from a clerical error made by the county that might otherwise prevent them from voting. |
|
As stated, no one will be allowed to vote without ID, vote in the wrong precinct, or vote when they have not been previously registered. |
|
Under this system, there will be a small number of ballots. |
|
This procedure costs the taxpayer nothing but gives a campaign an inexpensive way to begin to make an official case for vote irregularities promptly if the campaign has reason to believe they have occurred. It quickly dismisses charges of election fraud if the candidate can’t find it in the most likely areas. |
|
Extending the length of time election materials are retained past one major election cycle ensures there is time to scrutinize an election should it be necessary. |
|
This ensures that special interests do not gain any measure of control over the administration of an election. |